![]() |
||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
|
Home > Ratification of the Constitution > Elliot's Debates > Volume 5 > Debates in the Congress of the Confederation, from November 4, 1782, to June 21, 1783; and from February 19 to April 25, 1787.
An instruction from the legislature of Virginia to their delegates, against admitting into the treaty of peace any stipulation for restoring confiscated property, was laid before Congress. Also, resolutions of the executive council of Pennsylvania, requesting the delegates of that state to endeavor to obtain at least a reasonable term for making the payment of British debts stipulated in the preliminary articles lately received. These papers were committed to Mr. Osgood, Mr. Mercer, and Mr. Fitzsimmons. Mr. DYER, whose vote on the tenth day of March frustrated the commutation of the half-pay, made a proposition substantially the same, which was committed. This seemed to be extorted from him by the critical state of our affairs, himself personally, and his state being opposed to it. The motion of Mr. HAMILTON, on the Journals, was meant as a testimony on his part of the insufficiency of the report of the committee as to the establishment of revenues, and as a final trial of the sense of Congress with respect to the practicability and necessity of a general revenue equal to the public wants. The debates on it were chiefly a repetition of those used on former questions relative to that subject. Mr. FITZSIMMONS, on this occasion, declared that, on mature reflection, he was convinced that a complete general revenue was unattainable from the states, was impracticable in the hands of Congress, and that the modified provision reported by the committee if established by the states, would restore public credit among ourselves. tie apprehended, however, that no limited funds would procure loans abroad, which would require funds commensurate to their duration. Mr. HIGGINSON described all attempts of Congress to provide for the public debts out of the mode prescribed by the Confederation as nugatory; that the states would disregard them; that the impost of five per cent had passed in Massachusetts by two voices only in the lower, and one in the upper, house; and that the governor had never formally assented to the law; that it was probable this law would be repealed, and almost certain that the extensive plans of Congress would be reprobated.
|
||||||||||
| Master of American History and Government: | Home | About | Admission | Schedule of Courses | Course Registration | Tuition | Faculty | Request More Information |
||||||
| Free Saturday Seminars for Teachers: | Upcoming Saturday Seminars | Register Online | Previous Seminars | ||||||
| Free Summer Institutes for Teachers: | Upcoming Summer Institutes | Previous Institutes | ||||||
| Historical Documents Library: | Home | Founding
Era | Expansion Era | Civil
War Era | Progressive Era Post World War II Era | General Resources |
||||||
| Online Audio Lectures and Discussions: | Home | ||||||
| Special Exhibits: | Constitutional Convention | Ratification of the Constitution | ||||||
| Teaching American History Grants: | Partner with the Ashbrook Center | TAH Grant Web Sites | Ashbrook Center TAH Grant Partners |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
Support for teachingamericanhistory.org is provided by the Verizon Foundation. |
|
A Project of the Ashbrook Center for Public Affairs at Ashland University 401 College Avenue | Ashland, Ohio 44805 (419) 289-5411 | (877) 289-5411 (Toll Free) info@TeachingAmericanHistory.org © 2006 Ashbrook Center for Public Affairs |